Adenine base editors engineering reduces editing of bystander cytosines

Adenine base editors (ABEs) catalyze A-to-G conversions at genomic sites of interest. However ABEs also induce cytidine deamination. We engineered ABEs to reduce the cytosine editing activity of them. This behind the paper post covers our recent work on development of more precise base editors.
Adenine base editors engineering reduces editing of bystander cytosines

Base editors are the most promising tools for use in genome engineering. CRISPR-Cas systems efficiently bind with target sequences, expose the ssDNA by R-loop formation on target, and induce double-strand breaks (DSBs). Base editors are composed of a partially inactive CRISPR-Cas system and deaminase.1-3 Because the CRISPR-Cas system is partially deactivated, base editors do not induce DSBs which cause genomic rearrangement or large chromosomal deletions. Cas protein in base editors practices target binding and R-loop formation. Deaminase protein recruited to the target sites by the linked CRISPR system deaminates exposed ssDNA on the target site. In turn, deaminated cytidine and adenosine were repaired to thymidine and guanosine, respectively. Base editors mediate efficient targeted base substitution on the genome.

For the adenine base editor (ABE), there is no known natural adenosine deaminase that works on ssDNA. The Liu group artificially evolved tRNA-specific adenosine deaminase (TadA) protein, which naturally catalyzes adenosine on RNA. The engineered TadA protein operates on ssDNA.3 The ABE containing engineered TadA efficiently converts adenine to guanine in the target site. Compared with cytosine base editors, ABE does not induce gRNA-independent DNA deamination.4, 5 However, it was reported that the ABE works on RNA and induces promiscuous RNA deamination.6-8 In addition, our group found that the engineered TadA has gained the function of catalyzing cytosine as well as adenine. These effects are caused by the DNA/RNA-binding properties of TadA proteins.9

After reporting that ABE catalyzes cytidine deamination in 2019, we began engineering TadA protein of ABE to mitigate the bystander effect. Cytosine conversion of ABE occurred in a specific motif, ‘TC’. We thought that the binding affinity of TadA cannot discriminate ‘A’ and ‘TC’. Our group discussed the idea with Dr. Jae-Sung Woo, a protein expert. Dr. Woo suggested that the other TadA orthologs may have strategies to prevent binding with non-adenosine. He compared TadA ortholog sequences with the engineered TadA and analyzed the binding structure of SaTadA and tRNA substrate. He suggested various mutations that affect binding affinity with substrates. We made various ABE mutants and screened them in human cells.

We found several key residues associated with cytosine binding. However, replacing these residues also lowered the adenine editing activity. We wanted engineered ABEs to maintain their own efficiency of converting adenine. Fortunately, two papers were published.10, 11 Each paper developed the ABE8 version for better activity! We rapidly introduced the key mutation on the ABE8 version. We finally found that engineered ABE, ABE8eWQ efficiently edited adenine with reduced bystander cytosine conversion. In addition, the key mutation, D108Q, is also related to the affinity of binding with RNA. ABE8eWQ reduced promiscuous RNA deamination as well as cytosine conversion. (Figure 1)

Figure 1 ABE8eWQ converts only target adenine without bystander cytosine editing and promiscuous RNA deamination.

On the other hand, we designed TadA mutants that bind only with the ‘TC’ motif rather than ‘A’ to make a new cytosine base editor. Previous cytosine base editors have great editing efficiency, however their great activity also affects neighboring cytosine bases within the editing window. As the previous ABE has a specific motif for cytidine deamination, we thought that a new cytosine base editor based on ABE would specifically catalyze TC-to-TT, or TC-to-TG. We found that one mutation, P48R, on TadA successfully increased cytidine deamination with lower adenosine deamination. Because cytidine deamination catalyzed by ABE dominantly resulted in guanine, we added two UGI proteins like other cytosine base editors to convert cytosine to thymine. Our new engineered adenine base editors, ABE-P48R-UGI and ABE-P48R, substitute only cytosine adjacent thymine in a narrow editing window preventing bystander cytosine editing. (Figure 2)

Figure 2 While canonical cytosine base editor (CBE) converts all cytosines in the editing window, ABE-P48R-UGI and ABE-P48R edit only cytosine adjacent thymine without bystander cytosine editing.

We hope that our new engineered base editors can be useful in therapeutic applications. Our group continues to apply the base editor to various disease targets and to develop editors for better activity. In addition, we are searching for the best system for delivery of base editors.

Many thanks to my supervisor, Dr. Sangsu Bae, great advisor, Dr. Jae-Sung Woo, and SeokHoon Lee, and my lab members for their help.

You can find all the details of our work in here.


  1. Nishida, K. et al. Targeted nucleotide editing using hybrid prokaryotic and vertebrate adaptive immune systems. Science 353 (2016).
  2. Komor, A.C., Kim, Y.B., Packer, M.S., Zuris, J.A. & Liu, D.R. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature 533, 420-424 (2016).
  3. Gaudelli, N.M. et al. Programmable base editing of A*T to G*C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature 551, 464-471 (2017).
  4. Jin, S. et al. Cytosine, but not adenine, base editors induce genome-wide off-target mutations in rice. Science 364, 292-295 (2019).
  5. Zuo, E. et al. Cytosine base editor generates substantial off-target single-nucleotide variants in mouse embryos. Science 364, 289-292 (2019).
  6. Rees, H.A., Wilson, C., Doman, J.L. & Liu, D.R. Analysis and minimization of cellular RNA editing by DNA adenine base editors. Sci Adv 5, eaax5717 (2019).
  7. Grunewald, J. et al. CRISPR DNA base editors with reduced RNA off-target and self-editing activities. Nat Biotechnol 37, 1041-1048 (2019).
  8. Zhou, C. et al. Off-target RNA mutation induced by DNA base editing and its elimination by mutagenesis. Nature 571, 275-278 (2019).
  9. Kim, H.S., Jeong, Y.K., Hur, J.K., Kim, J.S. & Bae, S. Adenine base editors catalyze cytosine conversions in human cells. Nat Biotechnol 37, 1145-1148 (2019).
  10. Richter, M.F. et al. Phage-assisted evolution of an adenine base editor with improved Cas domain compatibility and activity. Nat Biotechnol 38, 883-891 (2020).
  11. Gaudelli, N.M. et al. Directed evolution of adenine base editors with increased activity and therapeutic application. Nat Biotechnol 38, 892-900 (2020).

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Biotechnology and Bioengineering Community, please sign in